Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

PAR sent me your way from http://www.boatdesign.net...

 

Im starting the design process for a competitive rowing scull. When I say competitive I mean club level- not the Olympics but somewhere in between. I have competitively rowed for several years on sweep and am transitioning to sculling. I am in the process of trying out several different style sculls on the water. My biggest issue is starting the design. Ive been doing alot of background research on popular designs like the King Fisher. These designs would not result in optimal speed due to my body type (<130lbs, 5ft 9inches).

 

What is the best way to determine optimal hull length and beam width for a light weight women's scull?

 

 


Posted

Wow, honestly I don't know. Rowing is quite different than kayaking so I don't think I can give you any good advice since I know virtually nothing about scull designs. Narrower and more round shape create the lowest resistance but there is going to be more to making a good scull. 

 

You really need to find someone with experience in sculls and pick their brains.  It's just to far from what I know for me to be of any help.

Posted

I have "designed" a few of my own boats by finding something close to what I wanted, and then making it more what I wanted.

Models really help, and can be cheap.

I would begin by asking around about competitive sculls like you want, then looking at as many as you can, no matter what they are made of. Measure, take pictures, row them.

Part art, part science. Good luck.

Posted

As a former collegiate rower and sculler (sculler on the side, not much collegiate sculling) I'd say that if you want to be fast you'll essentially copy dimensions from one of the big and successful companies...vespoli, empacher, resolute etc. Even in the amateur ranks you will see very high end boats made from very lightweight composites, fiberglass, carbon fiber etc. I've seen some very attractive wooden sculls but to be competitive...I don't know if that's realistic. My shell was something like 25 feet long and weighed in at something like thirty pounds give or take. That was in the 1990s so my memory may not serve. I'm sure they've gotten lighter since. Could be a true work of art though.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Supporting Members

Supporting Members can create Clubs, photo Galleries, don't see ads and make messing-about.com possible! Become a Supporting Member - only $12 for the next year. Pay by PayPal or credit card.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.