Jump to content

Spindrift 9N build #1174


Luke

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone, this is my first post--I've been lurking here getting lots of good info as I build and finally have a few questions myself!

 

By now the boat is 3D and wired together. The hull, bulkheads, and transom all seem to fit well, and the boat has no twist in it that I can discern. Measurements from the peak of the bow to the corners of the transom are 109" +/- an 1/8", and sighting down the centerline, the tips of the nesting bulkheads "disappear" below the transom at the same time.

 

IMG_20170515_211929.thumb.jpg.af65c7e361ede39ce2a506a2d848c9c3.jpg

 

I've made a number of spanish windlasses to pull the sides together between the forward and mid bulkhead, to pull out the 1/2" gap between the bottom and the bottom of the nesting bulkheads, to pull the forward bulkhead forward onto its lines, and lastly to try to flatten the bottom seam between bulkheads slightly to close a gap in the bottom panels.

 

The question is how much of a gap along the keel seam is acceptable? It goes from no gap at the transom and widens to about 1mm around the nesting bulkheads, and up to a maximum of about 3mm halfway between the forward and mid bulkheads. I think the epoxy fillets will cover it just fine, but I just want to make sure it's not a symptom of a larger problem.

 

Also, the plans don't really give dimensions to make a breasthook or quarter knees--do I just make these to fit the shape of the hull as it stands now? The instructions say the breasthook (included with the kit I suppose) is important to ensure the bow takes the correct shape--so what gives? The sheer lines look nice.

 

Lastly, I centered the kerf gap of the nesting bulkhead on the "center frame" lines running down the sides--is that correct?

 

Thanks!

 

 

 

Additional photos

 

Looking aft:

IMG_20170515_211943.thumb.jpg.2a90f72a992b737594fe27f78818b91d.jpg

 

 

chine

IMG_20170515_212943.thumb.jpg.3e53269487330946e87a51bb2f14b2ed.jpg

 

bow and gap

IMG_20170515_212838.thumb.jpg.ddea0587759666baf9d45e43460ffcfb.jpg

 

forward bulkhead

IMG_20170515_201939.thumb.jpg.944001e2a29b71688f99b9831df0c784.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Hi Luke,

 

Welcome to the forum.

 

Pulling from the sides will not help with closing the keel gap. I would use gravity. If you shift the forward cradle to the position of the widest gap it should close the gap. Make sure that the keel line is taking all of the weight. If it does not close all of the way immediately, give it some time. The nesting bulkheads may need trimming by a mm or two if they are too tight.

 

Yes the bulkhead line on the side plan is the kerf line between the nesting bulkheads.

 

You should have gotten full size shapes for the knees. If you did not, you can email me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, I'll try that. 

 

After some more thought, it seems like if the hull is glued together now, twist might be induced once the tension from the winches is released. I guess it should be twist free under gravity alone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Too close the gap on my kit I found it easiest to put the twist of the wires on the inside of the boat and pulling up when tightening. I had a gap similar to yours which I was able to close completely with this method. I did add additional wires between the ones shown on your pictures.

 

In case my post wasn't clear you can see the additional wires I used to close the gap in my attached picture.

 

WP_20170226_15_41_55_Pro.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I'm nearly finished and now wondering about the location of the screw-out deck plates.

 

I bought a couple of plates that are 5-7/16 (6 3/4 overall) and would like to install the on top of the rear seat/floatation tanks. My initial thought was that they'd be more accessible for storing small accessories on the top rather than on the side of the tank. The top would also accommodate the larger size plates due to the internal supports. Do the plans specify the side and the relatively small diameter for structural reasons, or is the top acceptable?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

Supporting Members

Supporting Members can create Clubs, photo Galleries, don't see ads and make messing-about.com possible! Become a Supporting Member - only $12 for the next year. Pay by PayPal or credit card.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.