Jump to content

Scott Pettigrew

  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Other groups

Supporting Member

Scott Pettigrew last won the day on October 13

Scott Pettigrew had the most liked content!

Profile Information

  • Location
    Kansas City
  • Supporting Member Since

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Scott Pettigrew's Achievements


Contributor (5/14)

  • One Year In
  • Collaborator
  • Dedicated Rare
  • Conversation Starter
  • First Post

Recent Badges



  1. Very nice. Don't realize how small it is until you put it next to the others. What skin/paint did you use?
  2. Thanks. The LV is narrow, but the paddler is only 140 lbs. Is that heavy enough so that the full size Ravenswood hull doesn't ride too high?
  3. Looks great! Is that urethane minus any coloring? I also used the two part urethane and wonder what it would look like without the pigment.
  4. I know, I know...there's a FAQ for that! Hear me out, I've narrowed it down to one of three boats and I'm looking for some opinions. The Kayak will be used for recreational day paddling. No fishing or overnight expeditions (most likely). The primary paddler is 5'7" and 140 lbs. This person is an adult so lets assume their weight will stay constant. I've eliminated the kids kayaks and the longer boats for easier roof mounting. I'm eliminating Vardo because I've already built one, and although I love it, want something different. The Curlew is nice but I'd rather not deal with stitching the fantail I'm down to the: Short Shot - because Jeff said it was probably his favorite design. Also, I'd like to try paddling a multichine boat. Ravenswood - It's the right size and the hard chine is slightly lighter and easier to build Ravenswood LV - Based on the paddlers size. I'd love to hear opinions from fellow kayak builders/paddlers.
  5. When I built my Vardo last winter I got sticker shock with cedar pricing. Thankfully it's come down, and considering the slow down in new home construction, lumber prices should remain "normal."
  6. I would probably fill each hole with thickened epoxy, but I already have some on hand from another project. If my choice was between buying epoxy and wood flour or buying new cedar I'd go with new cedar.
  7. A lot of effort for something that's flimsy and won't last. On the other hand, after paddling this maybe it will motivate them to build something more substantial.
  8. That's some good advice. I didn't have a fantail to contend with, but was concerned about numerous wrinkles and bunching. Shrinking the fabric solved much of it (I was using Nylon). Your last point is very true. Every project has flaws. Usually only the builder can see them. Once you get on the water all will be forgotten.
  9. Regarding knots and lashing, Jeff covers them in his instruction manual and his YouTube video here: Even though I didn't end up finishing my Cape Falcon kayak, I had already paid for their Skin on Frame Kayak Building Course (https://cape-falcon-kayak.thinkific.com/courses/kayak-building). It's not cheap, but probably much cheaper than an in person course. Why should you buy it? I still watched the videos, particularly some of the details on building a coming, lashing the gunwales, keel, stringers, and skinning the boat. He provides great detail on stitching the skin, stretching it, getting out the wrinkles, applying a two-part urethane, etc. You can watch the free prep course (https://cape-falcon-kayak.thinkific.com/courses/skin-on-frame-kayak-building) to get a feel for what the videos are like. An additional note regarding what build method you should use, I have also built a stitch and glue canoe (Sassafras 16 from CLC), and a strip built sailing canoe (https://duckworks.com/ulua-plans/). While I don't have the experience level of Dave, my opinion is that skin on frame is absolutely the best way to go for a kayak if what you want to do is get on the water quickly, cheap, and not throw your back out hoisting the thing on the roof. The other methods produce a strong and beautiful boat, but take more time and money. The other build techniques have their place. I'm planning on building a small sailboat using stitch and glue in the near future.
  10. In regards to question #1, I started building one of Cape Falcon's kayaks and was probably 2/3rds finished with the frame when I shelved the project and went with KudzuCraft instead. The amount of print and video material on "traditional" skin on frame is probably what swayed my decision initially. It seemed to be what most people were doing, so the masses must not be wrong....right? What changed my mind was when I started discussing with the designer my steam bent ribs, and he was talking about how if they are off by just a half inch it could dramatically change the stability and/or performance of the boat. It was becoming more art than science. I think had a I finished the kayak all would have been ok, but didn't want to waste any more time on a potentially poorly functioning boat. Another thing about the traditional method that makes me chuckle is how some of the builders act like they are paying homage to the Inuit. While the completed frame may roughly resemble what the Inuit built, nothing about the process is the same. I'm pretty sure the Inuit didn't have table saws and plunge routers. Once I realized that the way the Inuit built boats was based on the materials and tools available to them and not on what is the best method TODAY based on modern materials and tools, the decision on picking a design was easy. Bottom line, I think the Kudzu Craft designed boats are far superior. Not only do they provide a more accurate and consistent hull shape, but they are stronger (my opinion), easier and quicker to build, require fewer woodworking skills/tools, and possibly cheaper. If you decide to go the traditional route, I'll give you my partially finished CapeFalcon frame. You just need to drop by KC to pick it up. Regarding the skills/tools needed, one idea is to tap into the local woodworker/boatbuilder community. Here in KC we have a woodworkers guild. Members have access to a fully equipped shop plus the expertise of the members. Something similar probably exists in the SF area. Additionally, if you read through the threads posted here you'll find the answer to almost every question imaginable. Good luck! Scott
  11. @Hal Hammond Thanks for the report. I'm about the same size as you, but would probably opt for the bigger boat. However, I'm leaning towards building a short shot next; would like to experience the multichine design. Decisions...decisions. ?
  12. @Hal Hammond Very nice. I'm reading the description of the Ravenswood LV on kudzucraft and the low stability discussion. How do you perceive the stability related to other kayaks? I'm thinking this might be my next kayak build. I like the lighter weight and shorter length relative to my Vardo.
  13. 27 lbs is light. I'm no engineer, but I think the 3/8 will be fine. What color is that?
  14. I didn't use polyester, but can probably answer #3. The pigment is mixed in with the urethane, therefore if the urethane works on polyester, then the pigment will work.
  15. Thanks. Turned out better than I expected. Skin Boats (https://www.skinboats.org/) provided the pigment and they recommend only using a small amount...adding just a teaspoon at a time until the desired color is achieved. Thing is, I never was happy with the color and ended up using all of the pigment to get the color dark enough. Although there are many drips and runs that you can't see in the pictures, I'm satisfied with the final result.
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.